2007 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2011 Toyota Yaris
To start off, 2011 Toyota Yaris is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Yaris is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Yaris. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Yaris.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Yaris, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Yaris. (139 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Yaris.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda RX-8 | 2011 Toyota Yaris | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-8 | Yaris |
Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1689 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 42 L |