2007 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 139 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2007 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mercedes-Benz C. (340 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mercedes-Benz C | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | C | C30 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |