2007 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL (530 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mercedes-Benz CL | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | CL | Armada |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5461 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 382 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |
