2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK (350 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | CLK | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2007 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2380 mm |