2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2006 Ford Falcon. (200 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | CLK | Falcon |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5461 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 382 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.5 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2930 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |