2007 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML (215 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 940 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | ML | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |
