2007 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 525 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML. (400 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML. 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | ML | Clio |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2685 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 407 Nm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2175 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |