2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher.
Because 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK (300 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
Model | SLK | Cooper |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |