2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito (148 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano. (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mercedes-Benz Vito | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Vito | Viano |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 2147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 88.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |