2007 Mercury Milan vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mercury Milan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mercury Milan would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2007 Mercury Milan. (160 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Mercury Milan.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mercury Milan. (203 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mercury Milan. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2007 Mercury Milan has manual transmission. 2007 Mercury Milan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Mercury Milan 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Mercury Cadillac
Model Milan CTS
Year Released 2007 2013
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2299 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.4 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 11.3
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1442 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 68 L