2007 MG TF vs. 2006 Suzuki Aerio
To start off, 2007 MG TF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Aerio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Aerio would be higher. At 2,293 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Aerio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Aerio (155 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2007 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Aerio should accelerate faster than 2007 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 MG TF weights approximately 135 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Aerio.
Because 2006 Suzuki Aerio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 MG TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Aerio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Aerio (206 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Aerio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2007 MG TF | 2006 Suzuki Aerio | |
Make | MG | Suzuki |
Model | TF | Aerio |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |