2007 MG TF vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 MG TF would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 202 more horse power than 2007 MG TF. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2007 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 MG TF. (174 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2007 MG TF | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | MG | Holden |
Model | TF | Commodore |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |