2007 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2008 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,833 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2007 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2007 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mitsubishi Colt | 2008 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Daewoo |
Model | Colt | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 294 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |