2007 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pontiac Firehawk would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 229 kg more than 1995 Pontiac Firehawk.
Because 2007 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi L 200. (315 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi L 200.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mitsubishi L 200 | 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | L 200 | Firehawk |
Year Released | 2007 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2476 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 464 Nm |
Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 257 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 54 L |