2007 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 310 kg more than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander. (310 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Outlander | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |