2007 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-250 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander. (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Outlander | E-250 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 277 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4717 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |
