2007 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (266 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 64 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (450 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. (373 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Mitsubishi Jeep
Model Pajero Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2007 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3200 cc 4701 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 163 HP 266 HP
Torque 373 Nm 450 Nm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2004 kg 1940 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1850 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2700 mm