2007 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. (163 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero (373 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Pajero | E-350 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 57 L |