2007 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. (164 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 73 kg more than 2007 Mitsubishi Pajero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 373 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
Model | Pajero | CTS |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 11.3 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1442 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |