2007 Nissan 1400 vs. 1967 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Nissan 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan 1400 (63 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1967 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan 1400 should accelerate faster than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan 1400 (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan 1400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Nissan 1400 | 1967 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Nissan | ZAZ |
| Model | 1400 | 966 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 886 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2170 mm |
