2007 Nissan 1400 vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Nissan 1400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan 1400 | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | 1400 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 21.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |