2007 Nissan Armada vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2007 Nissan Armada is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Armada | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Armada | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 53 L |