2007 Nissan Armada vs. 1983 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2007 Nissan Armada is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP) has 279 more horse power than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1983 Volkswagen Polo.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. 2007 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1983 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1983 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Armada | 1983 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | Armada | Polo |
Year Released | 2007 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 40 L |