2007 Nissan Armada vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2007 Nissan Armada is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 300. (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 300. 2007 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Armada | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Armada | 300 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2450 mm |