2007 Nissan Armada vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Nissan Armada is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2006 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden UTE.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Armada | 2006 Holden UTE | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Armada | UTE |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2950 mm |