2007 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XF. (500 Nm). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Nissan Armada | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
| Model | Armada | XF |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5552 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 318 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 70 L |
