2007 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Armada. (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Armada | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Armada | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2947 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 98 L |