2007 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2013 Ford Expedition. (306 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Expedition.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Expedition. (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Expedition.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Armada | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Armada | Expedition |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2332 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 106 L |