2007 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Armada. (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (625 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Nissan Armada | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
| Model | Armada | XJ |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5552 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 318 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3157 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |
