2007 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Armada | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Nissan | Jeep |
Model | Armada | Compass |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5552 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 51 L |