2007 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. (266 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. (377 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Nissan Armada | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5552 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 318 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 377 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 87 L |
