2007 Nissan Frontier vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Frontier (152 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Frontier. (232 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Frontier | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Frontier | Epica |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |