2007 Nissan Hardbody vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2007 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Hardbody (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Hardbody (265 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Hardbody | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Hardbody | 140 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3275 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |