2007 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Hardbody. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 341 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX.
Because 2007 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Nissan Hardbody | 2009 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Nissan | Acura |
| Model | Hardbody | CSX |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3275 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
