2007 Nissan Murano vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Murano would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 2007 Nissan Murano. (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan Murano.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan Murano. (331 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Nissan Murano | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Murano | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | Crossover | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 331 Nm | 746 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |