2007 Proton Arena vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Proton Arena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Proton Arena would be higher. At 2,361 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2007 Proton Arena. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2007 Proton Arena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 320 kg more than 2007 Proton Arena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Proton Arena. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Proton Arena | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Proton | Toyota |
Model | Arena | Matrix |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1467 cc | 2361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |