2007 Proton Gen vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2007 Proton Gen is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Proton Gen (109 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Proton Gen should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Proton Gen, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Proton Gen. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Proton Gen.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Proton Gen | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Proton | Reliant |
| Model | Gen | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 38 L |
