2007 Renault Clio vs. 1978 Zastava 132
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 385 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132. 2007 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1978 Zastava 132 has manual transmission. 1978 Zastava 132 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Renault Clio | 1978 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Renault | Zastava |
Model | Clio | 132 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |