2007 Renault Clio vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Saturn L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Saturn L would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (182 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 4 kg more than 2007 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (250 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Renault Clio | 2004 Saturn L | |
Make | Renault | Saturn |
Model | Clio | L |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 151 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 59 L |