2007 Renault Clio vs. 2004 Suzuki Vitara
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Vitara would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Vitara (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Vitara should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 165 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Vitara.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki Vitara (220 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Renault Clio | 2004 Suzuki Vitara | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Clio | Vitara |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 220 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |