2007 Renault Clio vs. 2006 Tata Safari
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Tata Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Tata Safari would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Tata Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Tata Safari (135 HP @ 5530 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Tata Safari should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Tata Safari weights approximately 440 kg more than 2007 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Tata Safari (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Tata Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Renault Clio | 2006 Tata Safari | |
Make | Renault | Tata |
Model | Clio | Safari |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5530 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |