2007 Renault Clio vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 236 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Renault Clio | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Renault | Jeep |
Model | Clio | Compass |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 51 L |