2007 Saturn Outlook vs. 2010 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Saturn Outlook. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Saturn Outlook would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2007 Saturn Outlook. (271 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2007 Saturn Outlook.
Because 2007 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Lincoln MKS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Saturn Outlook. (336 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Saturn Outlook | 2010 Lincoln MKS | |
| Make | Saturn | Lincoln |
| Model | Outlook | MKS |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 336 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5184 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1928 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1565 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 76 L |
