2007 Saturn Outlook vs. 2011 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac STS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Saturn Outlook. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Saturn Outlook would be higher. Both 2007 Saturn Outlook and 2011 Cadillac STS are equipped with a 3,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2007 Saturn Outlook. (276 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2007 Saturn Outlook.
Because 2007 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac STS (368 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Saturn Outlook. (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Saturn Outlook | 2011 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Saturn | Cadillac |
| Model | Outlook | STS |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 368 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2957 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 64 L |
