2007 Smart ForTwo vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2007 Smart ForTwo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 660 kg more than 2007 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Smart ForTwo | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Smart | Studebaker |
| Model | ForTwo | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 4246 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2980 mm |
