2007 Smart ForTwo vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2007 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 2007 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2007 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Smart ForTwo | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Smart | Aston Martin |
Model | ForTwo | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.7 L/100km | 4 L/100km |