2007 Suzuki Aerio vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Suzuki Aerio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Suzuki Aerio would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 205 more horse power than 2007 Suzuki Aerio. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2007 Suzuki Aerio.
Because 2007 Suzuki Aerio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki Aerio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Suzuki Aerio. (206 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Suzuki Aerio. 2007 Suzuki Aerio has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2008 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Suzuki Aerio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Suzuki Aerio | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Suzuki | Holden |
Model | Aerio | Commodore |
Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |