2007 Suzuki Reno vs. 1979 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2007 Suzuki Reno is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Suzuki Reno (127 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 105 kg more than 1979 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2007 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 1300. 2007 Suzuki Reno has automatic transmission and 1979 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1979 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Suzuki Reno will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: