2007 Suzuki Reno vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2007 Suzuki Reno. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2007 Suzuki Reno.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Suzuki Reno | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Suzuki | Audi |
Model | Reno | RS3 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |