2007 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 515 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2007 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Toyota 4Runner | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Toyota | Smart |
Model | 4Runner | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 415 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 33 L |